I won’t list the entire set of effects included here – you can see that at in the image below – but there’s over 130 of them which includes some particle generation (lightening, rain, blood), multiple keying options, lighting and colour tweaking. But if you don’t want to muck about exporting media between two bits of software, then the plug-in bundle is the one you want. Oddly, this is $100 USD more than their standalone product which actually offers more functionality (such as motion tracking and other goodies). This stuff is not cheap mind you the bundle costs $499 USD which translates to a very irritating £410 when you change the country to UK – something to do with tax regimes, according to HitFilm. HitFilm plugins Cartoon Effect in Sony Vegas Pro This is convenient and, dare we say it, fun. This means that instead of having to export your project to HitFilm’s standalone effects suite you can now, through the magical power of “OFX”, simply add an effect directly to your media on the edit timeline. With a little time you can develop a script to mirror everything from your local copy to the server (or vice versa) allowing something similar to the git pushing / pulling.Those clever chaps at HitFilm, a British software development firm, have unleashed some of their effects technology as a series of standalone plug-ins for various editing programs including Adobe Premiere Pro, Final Cut Pro X and Sony Vegas Pro. I much prefer this workflow for long coding sessions.Īlso, as a side note, if you're stuck having to FTP files to a server because for some reason they don't have SFTP (as was the case in a recent project), you should check out lftp. As others have pointed out, since I like vim, I probably should just do vim + ssh and have no lag, but the graphical file structure is helpful.įor times when it makes sense to do the work locally, I typically use git to record the changes and push them up to the main server. I'm not clear as to what CyberDuck offers in this regard that Transmit does not - I've used CyberDuck and it doesn't seem any better at that process. Saving the file causes Transmit to scp the changes back to the server. Each new file opened in Transmit opens a new tab in MacVim. A lot of the time I use Transmit hooked up to vim (MacVim) to edit live on the server. I've tried Transmit 4's mount as a volume and MacFuse and have found them to be buggy. UPDATE: I should have mentioned that I need to be able to do this over the open internet (securely), where I’m not connected directly to the same network as the server. So, have you used one of the following methods? Is there a configuration option I’m missing? How do you go about solving this problem? Transmit seems to have more aggressive caching (or a longer TTL on it) of filesystem details (part of what makes it feel more responsive).Macfusion allows you to easily customize a neat icon for each filesystem.Transmit much more randomly just stops working and gives no indication, I just can’t browse any more and have to disconnect/reconnect.Macfusion often crashes Finder the first time I access a newly connected filesystem (and is then reasonably stable).Transmit seems more responsive, when it’s working.Mount locally using Macfusion (which uses MacFUSE), via SSH.Mount locally using Transmit 4, via SFTP or.I’ve been doing that via one of the following options, and I’m wondering if anyone out there has a better solution. To do that, I need to be able to access files as if they were local, which means either duplicating them to my machine (lame, annoying) or mounting them directly. I’ll often jump in and make smaller edits over SSH via vi, but when I’m doing something bigger I much prefer to work locally, using TextMate (I’m on a Mac, obviously). Most of my work for Automattic is done on a remote sandbox machine, somewhere in Texas.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |